
Bush 'planted fake news stories on American TV
'By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
Published: 29 May 2006
Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.
Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.
The report, by the non-profit group Centre for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.
"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."
Ms Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.
The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.
The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.
Many of the corporate reports, produced by drugs manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Hallowe'en segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel - in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.
Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."
The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organised by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."
The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500).
Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.
Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.
The report, by the non-profit group Centre for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.
"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."
Ms Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.
The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.
The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.
Many of the corporate reports, produced by drugs manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Hallowe'en segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel - in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.
Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."
The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organised by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."
The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500).

21 Comments:
From the article
The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.
How long have they been SPEWING their propaganda?
It just never stops with these folks, does it?
They are truly without any sense of decency.
Have you always had the feeling that Fox News anchors simply read White House talking points straight off the Teleprompter? If you have, you're not alone. And not only are you not alone, but you're absolutely right.
Last week NewsHounds caught Brit Hume attacking Richard Viguerie, a conservative and former pollster who recently published a damning criticism of the Bush administration in the Washington Post. Here's our Brit:
HUME: Conservative activist Richard Viguerie - who pioneered direct mail in political fundraising - argues in Sunday's Washington Post that conservatives feel betrayed by President Bush, and urges them to avoid the polls in November, saying, "Nothing will change until there's a change in the GOP leadership." Viguerie may no longer hold much influence with the Republican Party, but he has a history of disillusionment with its leaders. In 1981, Viguerie said Ronald Reagan's Cabinet choices, "gave conservatives the back of the hand" and complained that Reagan allied himself with "the liberals, the Democrats and the Soviets." Viguerie later said of Reagan, "The emperor has no clothes on; just about every conservative I know is now acknowledging it."
Ooh, catfight. Got that, Fox News viewers? Richard Viguerie is not to be trusted because he has made statements in the past criticizing St. Ronald of Reagan. But NewsHounds were curious as to where Mr. Hume got that piece of information, so they went digging around. Look what they found in this Yahoo! Finance article:
In response (to the Post article), Peter Wehner, Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Strategic Initiatives, sent an e-mail message to an unknown number of persons, citing statements made by Viguerie in 1981, 1983, 1987, and 1988 that criticized some aspects of the Reagan Administration.
And wouldn't you know it, one of those emails happened to fall into the hands of Brit Hume who then catapulted the propaganda on his "news" show - without mentioning where he got it from, of course. How convenient.
Obviously worried that reading White House talking points isn't going to be good enough for Republicans this fall, Fox News is generously stumping for GOP candidates in other areas of their broadcast. Last week, during an interview with Ohio's Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ted Strickland, Fox host Greg Jarrett announced that "experts say (Ohio) is yet again shaping up to be a key battleground state," adding that it's "now a bit of a nail-biter." While this was going on, text at the bottom of the screen read, "Gubernatorial Race in OH Going To Be Close in Nov."
Fortunately Media Matters happened to notice this and pointed out that despite Fox News' claims of Ohio's key-battleground close-gubernatorial nail-biter status, the truth is somewhat different. I know, I know - you're shocked.
It turns out Ted Strickland currently holds a comfortable lead in the polls over Republican candidate Kenneth Blackwell - a May 8 Rasmussen poll gave him a 16 point lead (52-36), a lead which has been steadily increasing since January when Strickland only had a four point lead. Meanwhile, a Cleveland Plain Dealer from late April showed Strickland 10 points ahead (47-37). Doesn't sound like much of a "nail biter" to me, at least not at the moment.
So why didn't Fox News' banner text read, "Strickland comfortably ahead in Ohio?" Why didn't Gregg Jarrett announce that Ken Blackwell is slowly losing ground to his opponent?
Probably because that would be a bit too close to telling the truth for Fox's comfort.
Prepare to have your mind blown. I'm serious. This one will leave you scratching your head in bewilderment.
We all know that Tom DeLay is still in deep doo-doo over allegations of corruption and money laundering. Fortunately for Tom, he's still got a few supporters left who think he's not a lost cause. They've come together to create a website called DefendDelay.com, the purpose of which is to raise money for his legal defense. How nice.
Recently DeLay has come under fire from Robert Greenwald, the creator of Outfoxed, who has just released a new movie called The Big Buy: Tom DeLay’s Stolen Congress. As you might imagine, it's not particularly complimentary to the Former Hammer. So in an effort to discredit Greenwald, DefendDelay.com has posted at the top of their home page a video of Greenwald "crashing and burning" in an interview with... Stephen Colbert.
Now, most people with half a brain are well aware that Stephen Colbert isn't really a conservative, he just plays one for laughs on TV. It seems, however, that most of DeLay's supporters have less than half a brain and are therefore not familiar with such lofty concepts as "satire." As you might expect, the interview is full of silly questions like, "Who hates America more, you or Michael Moore?"
So why on earth have the brilliant minds behind DefendDelay.com posted this joke interview at the top of their website? There are two possible options:
1) They actually believe that this is a real interview. If they don't know who Stephen Colbert is, they might just have fallen for his schtick. Which would not only make them extremely dumb, but would also demonstrate just how good Colbert's satire is. But perhaps a more reasonable explanation is:
2) They know it's not real, but they think that anyone who wants to donate to Tom DeLay must be an utter moron. In this scenario, the creators of DefendDelay.com know that the Colbert Report is a comedy show, but they also know that people who are willing to cough up ten bucks for DeLay's defense fund will probably watch the interview and think that Colbert is a real conservative "nailing" Greenwald.
Either way, there's some serious idiocy going on here.
Bush Leagues
Bush's 'candor' was scripted response to planted question
By Amanda Moran
Capitol Hill Blue Staff Writer
May 28, 2006, 07:34
President George W. Bush's highly-publicized admission of "regrets" and "moment of candor" during a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Tony Blair this past week was actually a scripted response to a planted question with a British journalist.
Capitol Hill Blue has learned that the question was among a list of "proposed questions" given to British reporters by Blair and that both the British Prime Minister and President Bush knew the question was coming and had prepared responses.
Newsweek correspondent Richard Wolffe says it was obvious to the press corps assembled for the press conference that Bush knew the question was coming and had a response ready.
"Of course, it was very rehearsed, everything from the mannerisms you saw, the upwards glance up at the ceiling for inspiration," Wolffe says. "And for me, the big giveaway was at the end of that answer-I don't know if you could see it on camera, but the president flashed a big grin to those of us sitting in the front rows. It didn't seem that he was quite as contrite as his performance."
According to multiple sources, Blair planted the question with British reporters leaving England and informed the White House. Both Blair and Bush had scripted responses to the question and it was pre-determined that the question would be recognized so he could ask the question.
"It was a setup from start to finish," says a member of the press crew that covers Blair on a regular basis. "We knew the question was coming and we knew Blair had a response ready. As for Bush, we didn't know if he had been briefed but we suspected he had."
Two sources within the White House confirm Bush knew the question was coming and was ready with his scripted response.
Blair set the tone with this comment in the closing moments:
"You guys, come on, I want you to -- the British delegation, ask a few serious questions."
The setup came in the second question:
Mr. President, you spoke about missteps and mistakes in Iraq. Could I ask both of you which missteps and mistakes of your own you most regret?
Bush was ready:
Sounds like kind of a familiar refrain here -- saying "bring it on," kind of tough talk, you know, that sent the wrong signal to people. I learned some lessons about expressing myself maybe in a little more sophisticated manner -- you know, "wanted dead or alive," that kind of talk. I think in certain parts of the world it was misinterpreted, and so I learned from that. And I think the biggest mistake that's happened so far, at least from our country's involvement in Iraq is Abu Ghraib. We've been paying for that for a long period of time. And it's -- unlike Iraq, however, under Saddam, the people who committed those acts were brought to justice. They've been given a fair trial and tried and convicted.
Wolffe says Bush has to go the regret route because his other trite phrases just don't work any more.
"I don't think those cliches actually work so much anymore," he says.
FYI
copycats?
Much of Goebbels' overtly political propaganda was concentrated in the cinema newsreels, especially during the war. He was aware of the desirability of realism, which is not necessarily the same as reality. For example, the planned German invasion of Britain was filmed in Antwerp harbour so that audiences could be shown the 'invasion' as it happened. The problem with newsreels in a one-party state is that of course people went into the cinema expecting that the newsreels would contain propaganda on behalf of the party. As a result, audiences took to turning up late, coming into the cinema during the newsreel, thus ruining its intended effects. In an attempt to overcome this, Goebbels ordered that there should be a five minute break between the newsreel and the main feature. That didn't have the intended effect, though, as audiences just stayed out in the foyer until the newsreel and the break were over. Goebbels was finally obliged to order that all cinemas should be locked and stay locked as soon as the newsreel had started. Anyone who wanted to see a feature film now had no choice other than to watch the newsreel as well. Taylor (1979) describes how the captive audience, no longer able to vote with their feet, expressed their disapproval by laughing, jeering and shouting, especially during the latter stages of the war.
This hardly seems to support the common view of Goebbels as the consummate master of propaganda. The only way he can get his newsreels seen is to lock his audiences in. This also runs counter to the view we have expressed on occasion that the hypodermic needle view of audiences being injected with media messages can be a reasonably accurate representation in those circumstances where there is central control of the media and all competing messages are excluded. Of course, as the war wore on and death and destruction were brought ever more frequently right to the audiences at home, the optimistic messages of the official propaganda would have been contradicted by people's direct, lived experience.
http://www.cultsock.ndirect.co.uk/MUHome/cshtml/propaga...
That was the reason for Terezin.
It was a model concentration camp; Jews were allowed to write home, saying how wonderful it was, and many voluntarily did. And, in fact, it wasn't at all bad for a while. They didn't have to alter it to make it look good.
Until one day, of course, the Ubermenschen decided it had served its purpose.
I heard that Goebbels had a newsreel of Theriesenstadt, a concentration
camp, looking like a holiday camp for refugee Jews with them happily working away and wellfed, in order to counter rumors about the death camps generally.
Wow, fascinating.
Its just amazing to me how bad propaganda ultimatly is for the culture its being used on, yet its use keeps occuring, and the regime using it always fails, or has severe problems due to the propaganda.
Pox News viewers
need to be strapped to a gurney and injected with LSD.
Realism not necessarily the same as reality
Sounds a bit like Stephen Colbert's "truthiness."
Goebbels actually studied the public relations techniques of Edward Bernays, who is often called the father of public relations.
the State Dept. produced and passed of as news this item:
..The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.
I used to visit a couple of bipartisan sites and got tired of wasting my time trying to explain the obvious to right wing idiots:
Right Winger: Black is white.
Me: No, black is not white. (I furnish supporting evidence from sources such as Mein Kepmf because other references will be rejected for not being right wing enough. I funish quotes from Reagan, Poppy Bush, and Dubya, who say black is not white. God speaks to Right Winger that night in a dream and says black is not white.)
Right Winger, the next day: Black is white.
I am a veteran of offtopic's political section.
I finally got tired of arguing w/ righties who deny the truth no matter how clearly you present it to them, so I quit shortly after the 04 elections.
Maybe I'll go back one day to see what some of them have to say now.
Now I'm starting up over here w/ folks who are at least reality based.
I think we have quite a number of brain-washed idiots still around?
about 32% of the USA (Bush approval)
The cabal's propaganda campaign is obviously similar to Goebbels'.
That's why rethugs are rushing to compare Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" to Goebbels.
They want to water down the importance of the topic.
The difference between Karl Rove and Joseph Goebbels.
Joseph Goebbels didn't have televisions in every living room.
Holy Shit! Look at them all!
Fake TV News: List of Stations
Click on the station links below for details on how each television newsroom incorporated video news releases (VNRs) and/or related satellite media tours (SMTs) into their news broadcasts, without adequate disclosure to viewers. Click on the client links below for more information on the VNR they funded and how it was used across all stations.
http://www.prwatch.org/fakenews/stationlist
Station
Network
Owner
City
State
VNRs/SMTs
Clients
WBRC-6 Fox Fox/News Corporation Birmingham AL 1 Panasonic
WHNT-19 CBS New York Times Huntsville AL 1 Flower Promotion Organization
KAIT-8 ABC Liberty Corporation Jonesboro AR 2 Trend Micro, Cadillac
KGUN-9 ABC Journal Broadcast Group Tucson AZ 2 Panasonic, Knowledge Adventure
KABC-7 ABC ABC/Disney Los Angeles CA 1 Quest Diagnostics
KCBS-2 CBS Viacom Los Angeles CA 1 NetTrekker
KEYT-3 ABC Smith Broadcasting Group Santa Barbara CA 1 Texas Instruments
KMAX-31 UPN Viacom Sacramento CA 1 American Dental Association
KPIX-5 CBS Viacom San Francisco CA 1 Pfizer
KTLA-5 WB Tribune Broadcasting Los Angeles CA 1 Trend Micro
KTXL-40 Fox Tribune Broadcasting Sacramento CA 1 American Dental Association
KRDO-13 ABC Pikes Peak Broadcasting Colorado Springs CO 1 Trend Micro
KWGN-2 WB Tribune Broadcasting Denver CO 1 Trend Micro
The Daily Buzz Synd. Acme Communications National FL 1 Victoria's Secret
WBBH-2 NBC Waterman Broadcasting Ft. Myers FL 1 Capital One
WBFS-33 UPN Viacom Miami FL 1 Towers Perrin
WJXT-4 IND Post-Newsweek Corporation Jacksonville FL 1 Subway
WGCL-46 CBS Meredith Corporation Atlanta GA 1 Flower Promotion Organization
WRDW-12 CBS Gray Communications Augusta GA 1 AdSpace Networks
WTVM-9 ABC Raycom Media Columbus GA 2 AICPA, DaimlerChrysler
KGAN-2 CBS Sinclair Broadcasting Cedar Rapids IA 1 Subway
WCIA-3 CBS Nexstar Broadcasting Champaign IL 1 Siemens AG
WGN-9 WB Tribune Broadcasting Chicago IL 1 Trend Micro
WFXW-38 Fox Nexstar Broadcasting Terre Haute IN 1 General Foods
WRTV-6 ABC McGraw-Hill Indianapolis IN 1 American Dental Association
WSJV-28 Fox Quincy Newspapers South Bend IN 1 General Motors
WXIN-59 Fox Tribune Broadcasting Indianapolis IN 1 Trend Micro
WHAS-11 ABC Belo Corporation Louisville KY 1 American Dental Association
KSLA-12 CBS Raycom Media Shreveport LA 1 General Motors
KTBS-3 ABC Edwin Wray Shreveport LA 1 Panasonic
WBRZ-2 ABC Manship Media Baton Rouge LA 1 Siemens AG
WVUE-8 Fox Emmis Communications New Orleans LA 1 American Dental Association
WHDH-7 NBC Sunbeam Television Boston MA 1 Toshiba
WBFF-45 Fox Sinclair Broadcasting Baltimore MD 1 Heinz
WBOC-16 CBS Draper Communications Salisbury MD 3 Siemens VDO, General Motors, General Foods
WILX-10 NBC Gray Communications Lansing MI 2 General Motors, General Foods
WJBK-2 Fox Fox/News Corporation Detroit MI 2 NetTrekker, Cadillac
WWTV-9 CBS Heritage Broadcasting Co. Tustin MI 1 General Motors
KAAL-6 ABC Hubbard Broadcasting Rochester MN 1 Pfizer
KFJX-14 Fox Surtsey Media Joplin/Pittsburg MO 1 Siemens AG
KTVI-2 Fox Fox/News Corporation St. Louis MO 2 Masterfoods,Trend Micro
WDAF-4 Fox Fox/News Corporation Kansas City MO 1 American Dental Association
WCCB-18 Fox Bahakel Communications Charlotte NC 1 Knowledge Adventure
WCTI-12 ABC Lamco Communications New Bern NC 3 Panasonic, Sallie Mae, DaimlerChrysler
WGHP-8 Fox Fox/News Corporation Greensboro NC 1 American Dental Association
WLFL-22 WB Sinclair Broadcasting Raleigh NC 1 Panasonic
KASA-2 Fox Raycom Media Albuquerque NM 1 American Dental Association
KTNV-13 ABC Journal Broadcast Group Las Vegas NV 1 Siemens AG
NY1 Cable Time Warner New York NY 1 Sandals Resorts
WCBS-2 CBS Viacom New York NY 2 Leiner Health Products
WKBW-7 ABC Granite Broadcasting Buffalo NY 1 Heinz
WPIX-11 WB Tribune Broadcasting New York NY 1 Trend Micro
WSYR-9 ABC Clear Channel Syracuse NY 1 Bioibérica, Stiefel Laboratories
Ohio News Network Cable Dispatch Broadcast Group Cleveland OH 1 Siemens VDO
WCPO-9 ABC E.W. Scripps Company Cincinnati OH 2 Stiefel Laboratories, Flower Promotion Organization
WSYX-6 ABC Sinclair Broadcasting Columbus OH 1 Panasonic
WYTV-33 ABC Chelsey Broadcasting Youngstown OH 1 Stiefel Laboratories
KOKH-25 Fox Sinclair Broadcasting Oklahoma City OK 6 Trend Micro, Panasonic, Intel, Cadillac, Chemistry.com, Towers Perrin
KYW-3 CBS Viacom Philadelphia PA 1 Bioibérica
WHP-21 CBS Clear Channel Harrisburg PA 2 Subway, Flower Promotion Organization
WNEP-16 ABC New York Times Wilkes-Barre PA 1 Leiner Health Products
WPGH-53 Fox Sinclair Broadcasting Pittsburgh PA 1 Trend Micro
WPMT-43 Fox Tribune Broadcasting Harrisburg PA 1 General Motors
WPVI-6 ABC ABC/Disney Philadelphia PA 1 Panasonic
WLTX-19 CBS Gannett Broadcasting Columbia SC 1 Panasonic
WHBQ-13 Fox Fox/News Corporation Memphis TN 1 Texas Instruments
WKRN-2 ABC Young Broadcasting Nashville TN 1 Jackson Hewitt
KLBK-13 CBS Nexstar Broadcasting Lubbock TX 3 Siemens VDO
KLST-8 CBS Nexstar Broadcasting San Angelo TX 1 Flower Promotion Organization
KOSA-7 CBS ICA Broadcasting Odessa TX 1 General Motors
KYTX-19 CBS Max Media of Montana Tyler TX 3 Knowledge Adventure, Subway, General Foods
KZTV-10 CBS Eagle Creek Broadcasting Corpus Christi TX 1 Cadillac
WFAA-8 ABC Belo Corporation Dallas TX 1 Bioibérica
WCYB-5 NBC BlueStone Television Bristol VA 1 Texas Instruments
WHSV-3 ABC Gray Communications Harrisonburg VA 1 DaimlerChrysler
WVTV-18 WB Sinclair Broadcasting Milwaukee WI 1 Masterfoods
WVVA-6 NBC Quincy Newspapers Bluefield WV 1 Matrixx Initiatives
"Federal authorities are actively investigating..." Ahem. Federal...
authorities appointed by Bush are out to stop people from making fake news? Right.
If they're doing anything "actively" at all, we should be asking: Who are they trying to purge? Who is threatening to disclose something far more threatening than this? (Oh, I don't know...say, snuff film parties in the WH, done by special production teams at their torture dungeon in Poland...). What's the real story here?
"Investigators...are seeking information about stations across the country...." Ah, raids on "stations across the country" --to intimidate, silence, destroy evidence of something, harm Fox News business rivals, set precedents for invading studios and confiscating film...what? "Seeking information"...hm-m-m.
That the Bush junta FCC would be seriously seeking to uncover Bush junta wrongdoing is ridiculous on its face. Equally laughable, that it would be sincerely and objectively pursuing corporate wrongdoing, except as a vendetta against someone, say, who hadn't contributed as much as they were told to, to Republican coffers, or who had crossed them in some way.
Later, the article says, "The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report."
This investigation has been entirely conducted by non-profit public interest groups, which found a surprisingly high usage, by stations, of fake news videos, both government and corporate. No doubt, the FCC would love to, a) shut these public interest groups down, and b) figure out how to use their information to protect friends and punish enemies.
This article offers zero evidence that the FCC is doing jack shit. In that sense, it is misleading--unless it has sources that it hasn't identified. It's conceivable that some well-meaning person in the FCC, who somehow escaped junta purges, is try to highlight this report. But the impression that the FCC is running around the country trying to find out who used Rumsfeld's "sieg heil, Amerika" videos of Iraqis, or big drug companies' fake product news, in order to PUNISH them for it, is without foundation in the article, and likely way wrong.
The investigative groups involved claim that there is a distinction between fake news and real news. I don't know. Is there? Remember when all the war profiteering corporate news monopolies broadcast that fake event of Iraqis pulling Saddam's statue down as real? Turns out the Iraqis were Chalabi's henchmen, just recently flown into Baghdad, and that the square where this occurred was mostly empty (if you pulled the camera back off the small crowd around the statue). How is this different from Pentagon or corporate P.R. firms themselves filming the staged footage, or fake product news, and distributing it? Is NBC's or CNN's stamp on video footage any more credible than GM's or Pfizer's or the Office of Special Plans? The propaganda that PASSES for news in so-called legit news organizations is actually more shocking, and more newsworthy (in the real sense), than that a fascist government like this one--or the corporations that it models itself after--is making fake news videos.
Are we getting subtle disinformation here? I would like to think that the FCC is jumping into action, in response to scandalous discoveries by vigilant public interest groups, and that wrongdoers will be exposed and punished, and this nefarious practice of faking news--and the even more nefarious practice of creating an entirely faked other reality of Cowboy Bush killing the Bad Guys--will be stopped. But does promoting real news seem like something a Bushite agency would get behind?
Post a Comment
<< Home